Ziay Chat Forums

Ziay!

General Discussion Forum

Why is Chinese written history older than the Bible's date for the Garden of

This is a discussion on Why is Chinese written history older than the Bible's date for the Garden of within the General Chat forums, part of the Main Category category; Eden and the birth of mankind? If GOD hadn't created man yet, then how did all those Chinese people ...





Go Back   Ziay Chat Forums > Main Category > General Chat

FAQ Members List Mark Forums Read
Old 09-28-2009, 12:19 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1

Eden and the birth of mankind? If GOD hadn't created man yet, then how did all those Chinese people exist before MAN and WOMAN were even created?? Are all those Chinese aliens and non-human? Or is the Bible just wrong? Hmmmmmmmmmmm. Things to ponder.
Little girl16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 12:35 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Default

i am not sure but i do practice some chinese stuff. like tai chi. time is not real anyway. You could endlessly trip out your brain with time related "facts"
spinzaar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 12:35 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
Default

Really...do you have to ponder that hard? Chinese people aren't aliens! There are mounds and mounds of archaelogical and historical evidence that points to the existence of humans and civilizations way before the bible has anything created.
Butterfly74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 03:00 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Default

It ain't necessarily so
It ain't necessarily so...

(Look up George Gershwin for the rest of the lyrics.)
Bobo the King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 05:17 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2
Default

Are there really actual dates for "creation" in the bible? I've heard that based only on the bible, some biblical scholars have tried to infer dates. This doesn't make their inferences correct. Interpretation by people is not truth, it is interpretation. The truth is the truth.

Which comes to one of those questions about how to interpret the bible. Is it literal truth? Or is it recountings of events by people which are subject to interpretation? The accounts are not always consistent. The different books are different retellings of the same events. So what is truth?

The bible has wonderful teachings on how to live with each other, how to treat each other, how to strive for a greater good. So, for the sake of argument, what if the bible is not 100% true just as many of the non-biblical stories and myths we teach our children are not "true" yet they contain important lessons and meanings about what it means to be a human being? What it means to be "good" to yourself, your family, your fellow person. Does not being 100% correct in a literal sense diminish the value of the stories?

Personally, I think not.
Knowledge Seeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 02:00 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
Default

Jesus himself was an alien.
He came to the earth to teach the stupid humans how to live.
Black Dog is offline   Reply With Quote

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1